Questions for the GMs

[Doji Shinnosuke]

Meant to ask this sooner, but it slipped my mind—is there by any chance a little Glory for the various people who appeared in the drama performance?

[Shiba Ryusei]

And as a follow-up, what about the techie?

Ryusei didn't exactly perform, after all, so I'm inclined to say no, but figured I'd ask.

[Fukurokujin]

Meant to ask this sooner, but it slipped my mind—is there by any chance a little Glory for the various people who appeared in the drama performance?

And as a follow-up, what about the techie?

Ryusei didn't exactly perform, after all, so I'm inclined to say no, but figured I'd ask.

Provided the organizer actually publicly credits people (so, dear organizer, thank your cast and crew), we'll say that the participants in the event (including techies) gain a number of points of Glory equal to the Glory Rank of the organizer, minus 1, to a minimum of 1.

Once that is done, the organizer gains a number of points of Glory equal to the number of participants in the event (including techies), minus 1.

If the organizer does not publicly credit people, the organizer gains a number of points of Glory equal to the number of participants in the event (including techies), minus 1, as well as half that much Infamy (round up, please).

[Doji Shinnosuke]

Meant to ask this sooner, but it slipped my mind—is there by any chance a little Glory for the various people who appeared in the drama performance?

And as a follow-up, what about the techie?

Ryusei didn't exactly perform, after all, so I'm inclined to say no, but figured I'd ask.

Provided the organizer actually publicly credits people (so, dear organizer, thank your cast and crew), we'll say that the participants in the event (including techies) gain a number of points of Glory equal to the Glory Rank of the organizer, minus 1, to a minimum of 1.

Once that is done, the organizer gains a number of points of Glory equal to the number of participants in the event (including techies), minus 1.

If the organizer does not publicly credit people, the organizer gains a number of points of Glory equal to the number of participants in the event (including techies), minus 1, as well as half that much Infamy (round up, please).

This works out to basically the same result as the answer I got in PMs (3 XP for all participants, organizer was glory 4 at the time, I believe). What does acknowledging the participants require? Everybody takes an unmasked bow at the end of the performance or something? Program of acts that lists the cast and crew?

[Fukurokujin]

This works out to basically the same result as the answer I got in PMs (3 XP for all participants, organizer was glory 4 at the time, I believe). What does acknowledging the participants require? Everybody takes an unmasked bow at the end of the performance or something? Program of acts that lists the cast and crew?

Either of those will work.
If you're in Court and have a D8 action left, you could extend your thanks, publicly, and list those involved. That'd also cover it.

[Yasuki Masaki]

This works out to basically the same result as the answer I got in PMs (3 XP for all participants, organizer was glory 4 at the time, I believe). What does acknowledging the participants require? Everybody takes an unmasked bow at the end of the performance or something? Program of acts that lists the cast and crew?

Either of those will work.
If you're in Court and have a D8 action left, you could extend your thanks, publicly, and list those involved. That'd also cover it.

I assume something similar could apply for the Art Festival (acknowledging those who submitted works)? With a D9 court action, possibly?

[Cearnach]

Sure.

[Agasha Yuna]

For helping hand pt 2, can we assume when rolling for the child that they have a void point to spend on their big speech?

[Cearnach]

The 5k3 includes their Void Point. They are very small wee child-persons.

[Doji Hikaru]

For the debate event, does that count as one of our Court Actions for the day?

[Shiba Ryusei]

And if it does, oh BOY does it reward saying no to any sort of regency

[Soshi Eiji]

Bayushi-ue!

[Cearnach]

For the debate event, does that count as one of our Court Actions for the day?

Absolutely.

[Agasha Yuna]

For the debate event, does that count as one of our Court Actions for the day?

Oh. There are actually 2 debate events. Court debate on Regency, and the Law debate. I was assuming Law debate uses court action rules but is a new clear slate.

Is it limited by court action use at court? Or a fresh set of actions based on Shiba-ue as facilitator?

[Cearnach]

It's not really Court-court, so new set of actions based on Lady Shiba.

[Yasuki Ryoichi]

1. On day 8 an agreement was approved that included a Crane art service that increases a person's glory. Is this glory increase in effect on day 9? (If not, when does it take effect?)

2. On day 7 Ryoichi actually encouraged Gorobei to work together with Tatsuya in an RP thread. Is this of any help when trying to convince Gorobei not to fight Tatsuya in the "This Court isn't Big Enough" event?

[Kuni Shiori]

A question/request here.

[Cearnach]

1. On day 8 an agreement was approved that included a Crane art service that increases a person's glory. Is this glory increase in effect on day 9? (If not, when does it take effect?)

2. On day 7 Ryoichi actually encouraged Gorobei to work together with Tatsuya in an RP thread. Is this of any help when trying to convince Gorobei not to fight Tatsuya in the "This Court isn't Big Enough" event?

1. It is in effect even now.
2. Put it this way, the TNs used to be 15 to fight and 20 to not fight.

[Agasha Yuna]

It's not really Court-court, so new set of actions based on Lady Shiba.

That's a relief! Thanks for confirming.

[Ikoma Honoka]

Court today has officially opened, but as a formal debate on the question of Regency. The first question before the court is whether it is necessary and desirable to appoint an Imperial Regent until a Successor can be named. The TN for Court Actions related to this question is TN 24. The Court does not seem willing to entertain other matters until all three questions related to this matter are resolved. However, if it is not considered necessary or desirable for there to be an Imperial Regent, then the two following questions will be moot, and court will proceed as usual.

Just so I understand, there is an 'advance position' (do we need a regent) in place and we use court actions to agree/disagree? Or are we just answering question via advancing own position?